Blog

Molybdenum in the US reached $50,265 per metric ton in June 2025. Chinese 45% molybdenum concentrate hit a record 4,600 CNY per ton-unit in early September 2025. Ferromolybdenum peaked at 293,000 CNY per ton. This cycle has familiar surface drivers — stainless steel demand, supply tightness — but three structural features make it different from any moly cycle of the past twenty years. This article walks through what is unusual, models 2026 base, bull, and bear scenarios, and explains how procurement teams should write next year’s contracts.

Where moly is consumed

Molybdenum has narrow but high-value end uses:

Stainless steel is the dominant end use. Moly improves corrosion resistance — 316 stainless contains 2-3% moly and is the standard for marine, food-processing, pharmaceutical, and chemical-process equipment. Duplex stainless contains higher moly content and is used for aggressive corrosion environments (offshore oil and gas, desalination, pulp and paper).

The other notable user is the petroleum refining industry. Moly-based catalysts are used in hydrodesulphurisation (removing sulphur from fuels) and hydrocracking. Refinery catalyst demand correlates with global refinery capacity.

Recent price history

Mid-2024 to early 2026 has been a sustained uptrend:

Chinese 45% moly concentrate at 4,600 CNY/MTU and ferromoly at 293,000 CNY/ton in September 2025 represent multi-year highs. Western and Chinese prices have moved in close correlation, with the Chinese export-control regime keeping a wedge open between the two.

What is structurally different about this cycle

Three features set the 2024-2026 moly cycle apart from prior cycles:

1. Half of the world’s moly is a by-product of copper

Approximately 50-55% of global moly is mined as a by-product of porphyry copper deposits. Codelco’s Chuquicamata, Freeport’s Grasberg and Cerro Verde, Antofagasta’s Centinela and Los Pelambres, Southern Copper’s Buenavista and Toquepala — these mines all produce significant moly as a co-product of copper.

This is structurally important. By-product moly supply is governed by copper economics. When copper prices are strong (as they have been in 2025), porphyry copper miners produce more — which means more moly. When copper prices are weak, porphyry production slows and moly supply tightens.

In normal cycles, moly demand and supply respond to moly economics. In this cycle, copper economics are pulling moly supply with them in unexpected ways. The 2025 copper price rise should have produced more moly. It did, but not as much as expected — because Chinese smelter pressure on copper concentrate kept some porphyry operators in cash-flow conservation mode.

2. Captive supply concentration is unusually tight

Of the non-by-product moly supply, a meaningful share is captive. Climax Molybdenum (Freeport subsidiary) operates the Henderson and Climax mines in Colorado, producing primary moly. China’s primary moly producers concentrate production for domestic use. The freely tradable global moly market is smaller than the production figures suggest.

When buyers like ATI, Outokumpu, Aperam, and Acerinox look for incremental supply, they compete for a relatively shallow tradable pool. That intensifies the price reaction to incremental demand.

3. The China export-control regime adds a wedge

The MOFCOM 4 February 2025 export-control notice placed moly on the dual-use items list along with tungsten, tellurium, bismuth, and indium. Chinese moly exports have continued under the licence regime — moly is less politically charged than antimony — but the licence-application friction has slowed cross-border movement.

The practical effect: a Chinese-Western price wedge has emerged. Western buyers pay a premium for non-Chinese moly. Chinese buyers (steel mills, chemical plants) source primarily from domestic supply. The arbitrage that would normally close this wedge has been reduced by licensing friction.

Demand-side: why stainless steel is structural this cycle

Stainless steel demand has been strong, and the drivers look durable:

Grid-scale electrification. Electric transmission infrastructure (high-voltage AC and DC transmission), substation equipment, and power-generation hardware use stainless steel extensively. The global electrification programme is producing sustained demand.

Hydrogen and chemical processing. Green hydrogen electrolysers, alkaline electrolysis equipment, and adjacent chemical processing infrastructure use high-grade stainless. Multi-billion-dollar electrolyser fleets are being built across Europe, the US, India, and the Middle East (including in Saudi Arabia and the UAE).

Aerospace. Both commercial aviation (recovering passenger traffic) and defence aerospace (escalating military procurement globally) drive demand for moly-bearing superalloys.

Desalination. Gulf state desalination capacity continues to expand. Reverse osmosis and multi-stage flash plants use duplex and super-duplex stainless extensively.

Lithium and battery chemicals. Lithium hydroxide processing, sulphate plants, and ammonia-based ammonia-water-electrolyte systems use moly-bearing alloys. New lithium chemicals capacity in Australia, Chile, and Argentina is driving demand.

The unusual feature: most of these demand sources are project-driven and long-cycle. They build out over years, not months. Stainless mills supplying these projects have multi-year order books. Moly demand from these projects is more visible than ordinary stainless demand.

2026 scenarios

Au Club’s working scenario framework for 2026:

Base case (60% probability)

• Price range. US moly $42,000-52,000/MT. European moly oxide $20-25/lb Mo.
• Drivers. Stainless steel demand continues at strong levels. China export licences flow at moderate pace. By-product copper supply ramps modestly. No major mine disruption.
• Implications for buyers. Lock 12-month supply at current pricing. Multi-year contracts at modest premium are available.

Bull case for prices (25% probability)

• Price range. US moly $55,000-65,000/MT.
• Drivers. Significant additional supply restrictions from China (full export ban scenario). Major mine disruption at a key porphyry operation. Acceleration of hydrogen project demand.
• Implications for buyers. Forward purchases at elevated levels become necessary. Stockpile becomes economic to hold.

Bear case for prices (15% probability)

• Price range. US moly $32,000-42,000/MT.
• Drivers. Chinese export-control regime relaxed in a broader US-China trade deal. Stainless steel demand falls in a global recession. New mine supply ramps faster than expected.
• Implications for buyers. Defer forward purchases; buy spot.

How to write a 2026 moly contract

Three contract elements that matter:

1. Price formula. Most international moly oxide contracts price as a discount or premium to a published benchmark — typically Platts moly oxide or Fastmarkets moly oxide assessment. Avoid fixed-price for 12-month or longer contracts; the price volatility is too high. Use a published benchmark + premium/discount structure.

2. Origin clause. Specify whether the buyer requires non-Chinese material. The current pricing wedge between Chinese and non-Chinese moly oxide is meaningful. Buyers with US, EU, or defence-adjacent end markets typically specify non-Chinese origin.

3. Volume flexibility. Build in seasonal or monthly volume flexibility (±10% typical). Demand from steel-mill buyers and refinery catalyst buyers is not perfectly stable; the contract should accommodate.

Au Club’s offer

Au Club supplies molybdenum oxide (MoO₃, 63% Mo minimum) with 300 MT/month availability. Non-Chinese origin available for buyers with that requirement. FOB UAE, SGS inspection. LC and TT accepted.

The Au Club desk maintains active relationships with primary moly producers in Chile, Peru, Mexico, the US, and a number of by-product copper operators. We can structure spot, monthly offtake, and multi-year supply for buyers with appropriate requirements.

Au Club’s read for 2026

Three working positions:

1. Moly does not return to early-2024 prices in 2026. The structural drivers — stainless demand, China export friction, supply concentration — keep prices elevated. The base case range is $42,000-52,000/MT.
2. The Chinese-Western wedge persists. Non-Chinese moly continues to trade at a meaningful premium. Buyers with non-Chinese specifications should plan around this.
3. 2027-2028 brings potential supply easing. New by-product moly from ramping copper projects (Kamoa-Kakula expansions, Oyu Tolgoi underground full ramp, Indonesian copper smelter build-out) adds supply. Whether that arrives in time for 2027 depends on copper project execution.

For procurement teams: lock 2026 supply at current pricing. Engage now for 2027-2028 forward arrangements. Do not wait for Chinese policy clarity that may not arrive.

FAQs

About Au Club

Au Club supplies molybdenum oxide (MoO₃, 63% Mo minimum) with 300 MT/month availability. FOB UAE, SGS inspection. LC and TT accepted. Contact our trading desk to discuss 2026 and 2027 supply.

Sources & further reading

• International Molybdenum Association (IMOA)
• LME Molybdenum contract
• Fastmarkets molybdenum oxide assessment
• USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries — Molybdenum

Indonesia’s refined tin exports collapsed to approximately 46,000 metric tons in 2024 — the lowest in more than twenty years. The country accounts for roughly 25-30% of world refined tin supply and the government has confirmed plans to halt exports entirely. For tin concentrate buyers — refineries, downstream solder manufacturers, electronics suppliers, tinplate producers — the procurement question for 2026 is no longer “Indonesia or somewhere else?” It is “where else, and how do I qualify the supply?” Thailand is the answer Au Club gives most customers. This is why, with the working details on specification, logistics, and contract structure.

Why Indonesia is no longer the default

Three structural problems hit Indonesian tin supply in 2024-2025:

1. Smelter confiscations. In 2024, the Attorney General’s Office confiscated five private tin smelters representing approximately half of Indonesia’s refining capacity. The investigations involved allegations of illegal mining and corruption. The seized facilities operated at reduced or zero output during 2024.

2. RKAB (work plan) delays. Indonesia requires mining companies to submit and obtain approval for annual production plans (RKAB). Through 2024-2025, RKAB approvals from the Resources Ministry and Trade Ministry were delayed, suspended, or scaled back. Even smelters that were not confiscated faced production caps.

3. Government export-ban intent. Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Bahlil Lahadalia confirmed in February 2026 that the government intends to halt tin exports, replicating the 2020 nickel export ban model. Implementation timing is uncertain but the policy direction is clear.

The cumulative effect: 2024 refined exports of 46,000 MT was approximately half the 2020 baseline. 2025 trends are similar. 2026-2027 are uncertain.

What this does to global tin supply

World tin mine production in 2023 was approximately 290,000-310,000 MT (estimates vary by source). Indonesia historically supplied 80,000-90,000 MT. China is the largest producer at approximately 80,000-100,000 MT. Then Myanmar (volatile, approximately 30,000-50,000 MT), Peru, Bolivia, Australia, DRC, Nigeria, and Thailand round out the supply base.

When Indonesia withdraws even 30,000-40,000 MT, the market scrambles. LME tin prices reflected this through 2024 and 2025: ranging from $25,000 to $35,000 per metric ton, well above the pre-2020 averages of $18,000-22,000.

For concentrate buyers (refineries), the question is not just price but availability. The Indonesian disruption pushed refineries to qualify new origin relationships.

Thailand’s tin profile

Thailand has been a tin producer since the 19th century. Modern Thai production is smaller than peak years (which exceeded 100,000 MT in the 1970s) but remains commercially meaningful. Current annual mine output is in the range of 8,000-15,000 MT, with the variability driven by artisanal and small-mine activity rather than primary industrial operations.

The Thai tin chain has three distinct stages:

1. Mining. Predominantly small-scale and artisanal, with significant operations in Phuket, Phangnga, and Ranong provinces. Some industrial operations exist but the majority is independent producer-aggregator activity.
2. Concentrate consolidation. Aggregators consolidate concentrate from multiple small producers, blend to target Sn content, and present to smelters or to international export buyers.
3. Export. FOB Laem Chabang for container shipment; FOB Bangkok for break-bulk.

Thailand’s advantage for international buyers is structural reliability rather than scale. The legal environment is stable. The aggregator infrastructure is established. The export route through Laem Chabang is direct and efficient. The currency (Thai Baht) is convertible. The Thai government is not pursuing export restrictions.

Specification: 40-70% Sn concentrate

Tin concentrate sold internationally is graded by tin content:

A typical Thai concentrate Au Club moves into international markets sits in the 55-65% Sn range. Higher Sn content commands a higher price per dry metric ton, but the relationship is not linear — penalty schedules for impurities (especially arsenic, which raises smelting costs and environmental compliance burden) can affect the net realised price.

The Thai concentrate Au Club handles typically meets:

• Sn: 55-65% (specified per shipment)
• As: ≤ 0.5% (lower preferred)
• Fe: ≤ 5%
• Pb: ≤ 1%
• S: ≤ 2%
• Moisture: ≤ 5% at loading

Pre-shipment inspection is by SGS or Alex Stewart. Each shipment carries a Certificate of Analysis with chemistry, moisture, and weight.

Logistics: FOB Laem Chabang

The working logistics:

Loading port. Laem Chabang, approximately 2 hours by road south of Bangkok. Major container terminal with established mineral concentrate handling. Some shipments load at Bangkok or other Thai ports for break-bulk, but container shipment from Laem Chabang is the standard for international buyers.

Vessel sizing. Tin concentrate is high-value and low-volume per unit. Most shipments move in containers (20-foot, 25-30 MT per container) rather than break-bulk vessels. Lot sizes typically 50-300 MT.

Lead times. From order confirmation to FOB Laem Chabang typically 30-45 days, depending on aggregation cycle. Ocean transit to Gulf ports approximately 18-25 days. To European ports 30-35 days. To Asian destinations (China, Japan, Korea) 7-14 days.

LME tin price reference. Most concentrate contracts price as a discount to LME tin three-month, with the discount reflecting Sn content, impurity penalties, and smelter treatment charges. A typical 60% Sn concentrate might price at LME three-month tin minus 20-25% (representing the contained tin payable, treatment charges, and impurity penalties).

Malaysia and Myanmar as secondary origins

Two other origins Au Club tracks:

Malaysia. Historical tin producer with a small but consistent modern output. Pricing and reliability comparable to Thailand. FOB Port Klang. Volumes smaller than Thai aggregators.

Myanmar. A meaningful tin producer, but with three constraints. First, much Myanmar tin output is informal and concentrated in the Wa State region under unclear governance. Second, supply has been volatile, with significant interruptions in 2023 from operational disruptions. Third, US sanctions on Myanmar military entities complicate buyer compliance. Some buyers source Myanmar tin successfully; many compliance regimes flag it.

For buyers prioritising clean documentation and predictable supply, Thailand is the more accessible origin.

How an Au Club tin concentrate contract is structured

Standard terms for a refinery buyer:

• Volume. Per enquiry, typically 50-500 MT per shipment, with annual offtake commitments possible.
• Sn content. 40-70% (specified per shipment).
• Origin. Thailand (primary), Malaysia (secondary).
• Loading port. Laem Chabang (Thailand) or Port Klang (Malaysia).
• Inspection. SGS or Alex Stewart at loading.
• Documentation. COA, COO, BL, packing list, inspection certificate.
• Price formula. LME three-month tin minus negotiated treatment charge and impurity penalties. Fixed price available for shorter contracts.
• Payment. LC at sight, deferred LC (30/60/90 days), or TT against documents. Most international refineries use LC.

For first-time buyers, Au Club typically offers a single-shipment trial (50-100 MT) to allow the refinery to qualify the concentrate against its smelting process. Successful trial shipments lead to monthly or quarterly offtake.

Au Club’s read for 2026

Three working positions:

1. Indonesian supply remains unreliable through 2026. Whether or not the formal export ban implements on schedule, Indonesian tin in the international market will be intermittent and unpredictable. Plan around it, not for it.
2. Thai supply has structural headroom. Existing aggregator infrastructure can absorb additional buyer demand without disruptive price moves. 2026 supply is available for refineries willing to engage on contract structure.
3. LME tin trades in $28,000-38,000/MT range through 2026. The Indonesian uncertainty puts a floor under price; new supply ramp from secondary origins keeps a ceiling on speculative spikes.

For refineries and downstream tin buyers: qualify a Thailand origin now. The cost of qualifying a new supply chain is meaningful — sample analysis, smelter trials, documentation discipline — but it is much smaller than the cost of being short of feed when Indonesian shipments don’t arrive.

FAQs

About Au Club

Au Club supplies tin concentrate (40-70% Sn) from Thailand and Malaysia, FOB Laem Chabang or Port Klang. SGS or Alex Stewart pre-shipment inspection. LC and TT accepted. Contact our trading desk for sample analysis, trial shipments, and 2026 offtake arrangements.

Sources & further reading

• ITRI / International Tin Association — global supply data
• LME Tin contract
• Indonesia Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
• Thailand Department of Primary Industries and Mines

The 2026 annual copper TC/RC benchmark is being negotiated at or near $0 per metric ton — an unprecedented level. Smelters are paying for the privilege of refining concentrate. The cause is straightforward: Chinese smelter capacity additions over the past five years have run ahead of global concentrate supply growth, and Chinese smelters now account for over 90% of growth in global copper output. For cathode buyers outside China, that has translated into record LME prices and tight prompt availability of LME-registered Grade A material. This article explains the mechanism, the numbers, and the procurement implications for 2026 cathode buyers.

What TC/RC is and why $0 matters

Copper smelters do not produce copper from ore. They produce copper cathode from concentrate — typically 25-30% Cu material delivered from mines. The smelter’s revenue model has two parts:

1. By-product credits. Gold, silver, molybdenum, and sulphuric acid produced as by-products of copper refining.
2. Treatment and refining charges. A fee per ton of concentrate processed (TC, treatment charge) and per pound of payable copper refined (RC, refining charge). These are deducted from the mine’s gross revenue and paid to the smelter.

For thirty years TC/RCs have functioned as the global pricing mechanism for the concentrate market. When concentrate is scarce, smelters bid each other down to win tonnage — TC/RCs fall. When concentrate is abundant, TC/RCs rise.

The annual benchmark TC/RC is negotiated each year between Freeport-McMoRan (or another major Western miner) and a Chinese or Japanese smelter. The 2024 benchmark settled at $80/MT. The 2025 spot has run as low as the $20s. The 2026 benchmark is being negotiated at or near $0.

$0 is not a normal price level. It signals that smelters are willing to accept zero processing fee — or even pay miners — to keep their furnaces loaded. That has happened in moments of acute concentrate scarcity (China’s industrial growth phase in the early 2000s); $0 as a sustained benchmark is genuinely new.

What is causing this

Three structural forces are at work:

1. Chinese smelter capacity has run ahead of concentrate

Between 2015 and 2025, Chinese refined copper output approximately doubled. New smelters at Tongling, Jiangxi, Yangzhou, Yantai, and several other locations brought online substantial new capacity. China’s share of global smelter output rose from approximately 15% to nearly 50% over the decade.

Mine supply did not keep pace. Major new projects (Quellaveco in Peru, Kamoa-Kakula in DRC) added supply, but project delays at Las Bambas (Peru), Cobre Panamá (Panama, closed since November 2023), and Mongolia’s Oyu Tolgoi underground expansion limited the upside.

The structural shortfall: too much smelter, not enough concentrate. Smelter competition for concentrate drives TC/RCs down.

2. The Cobre Panamá closure removed material supply

First Quantum’s Cobre Panamá mine was producing approximately 350,000 MT/year of copper-in-concentrate when the Panamanian Supreme Court ordered closure in November 2023. The mine has not restarted. That removed roughly 1.5% of global mine supply at a moment when smelter capacity was still growing.

3. DRC quotas constrain growth

The DRC was the fastest-growing copper producer in the world through 2023. In early 2025 the government imposed export quotas (originally a ban, then a quota regime) that constrained the upside even when production was theoretically available. DRC Q1 2026 copper exports of approximately 955,000 MT were down 15% year-on-year from Q1 2025’s 1.09 million MT.

What this means for the LME copper price

The LME three-month copper price has reacted accordingly. Through late 2025, the price climbed toward $13,000/MT and reached a record $14,527.50/MT on 29 January 2026. The forward curve has shown sustained backwardation — physical buyers paying a premium for prompt metal.

The price reflects the combination of mine supply constraints, smelter overcapacity, and accelerating demand from electrification and AI data centres. Electric vehicles, grid-scale transmission, and high-density compute infrastructure all rely on copper.

The unusual feature of this cycle is the simultaneity of high cathode prices and zero smelter profitability. In most cycles, high copper prices benefit smelters because by-product credits scale with copper revenue. This cycle, smelter margins have collapsed because they paid up for concentrate years ago and now compete with each other for shrinking supply.

Why LME Grade A cathode from non-China origins has become strategic

For Western cathode buyers — manufacturers of wire and cable, electric motors, transformers, busbars — the buying environment has changed in two ways:

1. Prompt cathode availability outside China has tightened. Chinese smelters consume their own output, plus rising imports of concentrate from any available origin. The pool of cathode physically located outside China and registered to LME has shrunk in relative terms.
2. Origin matters more than it used to. After the April 2024 LME ban on Russian-origin metal (see our August 2025 article on the one-year impact), non-Russian Grade A copper trades at a documented premium. Sanctioned-jurisdiction supply complicates the supply book of any large Western buyer.

Au Club’s LME Grade A copper cathode (99.99% Cu min) is sourced from Turkey and the UAE. Sarkuysan in Turkey produces LME-registered cathode at scale. Several UAE-based producers serve the Gulf and Asian markets. Both origins are clean from a sanctions perspective and from a sourcing-disclosure perspective.

How to buy in a $0 TC/RC market

Three procurement adjustments worth making now:

1. Lock multi-year supply where possible. With cathode prices at record highs and forward curves in backwardation, the spot market is the worst place to be. Major Western consumers (cable manufacturers, electric motor producers) are signing 12-month, 24-month, and 36-month offtake agreements with Au Club and competitor traders. The premium for tenor is real but smaller than the spot volatility cost.

2. Diversify origin. A buyer with 100% supply from a single smelter is exposed to that smelter’s production disruptions, regulatory issues, and sanctions exposure. Aim for three or four origin relationships across two or three regions.

3. Negotiate premium structures. Cathode premium (the difference between physical price and LME) has widened. Codelco’s annual European premium for 2026 settled at multi-year highs. Premiums are not pure markup — they reflect physical scarcity. Engage on premium structure rather than just headline LME price.

Au Club’s offer

Au Club supplies LME Grade A copper cathode (99.99% Cu minimum) at 500-1,000 MT/month from Turkey and UAE producers. FOB terms. SGS or Intertek pre-shipment inspection. LC and TT payment. Full LME-registered brand documentation with each shipment.

For larger requirements (multi-year offtake agreements), the trading desk works directly with smelter relationships in Turkey, UAE, and selected European producers.

Looking ahead to 2027

The structural mismatch between Chinese smelter capacity and global concentrate supply is not resolving in 2026. New mine projects — Kamoa-Kakula expansions, Mongolian Oyu Tolgoi underground at full ramp, Indonesian copper from the Indonesian smelter build-out — will add supply in 2027-2028. But Chinese smelter capacity is also growing.

Two scenarios:

Base case. TC/RCs stay in single digits through 2026 and rise modestly in 2027 as new mine supply arrives. LME copper trades in a $11,000-14,000/MT range. Premiums remain elevated.

Bull case for buyers. A major Chinese smelter rationalisation. China has been signalling that it may consolidate or close inefficient smelter capacity. If 10-15% of Chinese smelter capacity exits the market, TC/RCs would normalise and physical premiums would compress.

For now, plan procurement around the base case.

FAQs

About Au Club

Au Club is a Dubai-based commodity trader supplying LME Grade A copper cathode (99.99% Cu minimum) from Turkey and the UAE. Multi-year supply structures available. SGS or Intertek inspection. LC and TT accepted. Contact our trading desk for current availability and pricing.

Sources & further reading

• LME Copper contract specifications
• International Copper Study Group (ICSG)
• S&P Global — TC/RC benchmark coverage
• Wood Mackenzie — Copper smelter capacity outlook

Saudi Arabia consumed 13.1 million metric tons of cement in the second quarter of 2025, up 21% year-on-year. The country is on track for approximately 78 million MT of annual cement demand by 2030 — driven by NEOM ($500 billion), the Red Sea Project, Qiddiya, Diriyah Gate, and a 600,000-home housing programme. Cement at that scale needs supplementary cementitious materials. Fly ash is the largest of those. This article explains why Vision 2030 has become a structural fly ash demand story, what the Class C / Class F distinction means for your sourcing decision, and how Au Club moves up to 1,000,000 MT per year of bulk fly ash into the Gulf.

What is driving Saudi cement demand to 78 million tonnes a year

The Vision 2030 build-out is concrete-intensive at a scale not seen elsewhere in the world. The headline projects:

• NEOM ($500bn). The Line (a linear city), Oxagon (industrial port city), Trojena (mountain resort), Sindalah (luxury island).
• The Red Sea Project. 50 hotels, 8,000 hotel rooms, 1,300 residential properties across 22 islands.
• Qiddiya. Entertainment city near Riyadh: theme parks, motorsport, water parks, residential.
• Diriyah Gate. Heritage-adjacent mixed-use development west of Riyadh.
• Roshn. State-backed residential developer building approximately 600,000 housing units by 2030.

Saudi cement output in 2024 reached approximately 55 million MT. Industry consensus projects 78 million MT by 2030. Q2 2025 sales of 13.1 million MT — annualised, that is about 52 million MT — confirm the trajectory is on plan or modestly above.

A cement-intensive economy that grows from 55 to 78 million MT in five years is not cyclical. It is structural. Cement producers, concrete suppliers, and supplementary cementitious material (SCM) traders are positioning for a multi-decade demand profile.

Why fly ash specifically

Fly ash is a coal-combustion by-product. Pulverised coal burned in power plant boilers leaves a fine glassy residue that, when mixed with portland cement and water, develops cementitious properties. Two practical reasons producers blend fly ash into concrete:

1. Cost. Fly ash typically costs less than portland cement. Substituting 15-30% of cement with fly ash reduces concrete cost per cubic metre.
2. Carbon. Each ton of portland cement embodies approximately 0.8 ton of CO₂ from calcination and fuel use. Fly ash has zero embodied carbon in the cement substitution role — it would otherwise be landfilled. NEOM and other Vision 2030 projects increasingly specify low-carbon concrete.

In January 2025 the NovusCrete Consortium — Public Investment Fund, NEOM, and other partners — was formed to develop sustainable concrete solutions specifically for giga-projects. Low-carbon concrete with significant SCM content is the working specification.

Beyond NEOM, the wider Saudi cement industry is pulled toward SCM use by carbon-pricing pressure (KSA is exploring an emissions trading scheme) and by international supply chain customers (LEED, BREEAM, and EDGE certifications all reward low-carbon concrete).

Class C vs Class F — the specification distinction

Fly ash sold globally is classified primarily under ASTM C618. Two grades dominate:

Class C has higher calcium content. It has some self-cementing properties and can be used at higher replacement ratios in some applications. It is the workhorse for general-purpose concrete.

Class F is the high-performance specification. Its higher silica/alumina/iron content provides better long-term strength, lower permeability, and better resistance to sulfate attack and alkali-silica reaction. It is the specification for marine concrete (Red Sea Project), high-strength applications, and tunnel-lining concrete (NEOM has extensive tunnelling).

Most NEOM, Red Sea Project, and Qiddiya specifications call for Class F. Roshn housing typically uses Class C. A trader supplying the full Vision 2030 portfolio needs reliable origins for both.

The four working origins

Au Club sources bulk fly ash from four primary origins. Each has its profile:

Laos

Class C and Class F available. Several Lao coal-fired power stations produce export-grade fly ash. Logistics: trucked to Vientiane or Pakse, river barge to Vietnam ports (Hai Phong, Vung Tau) for ocean shipment. Vessel sizing typically Handysize. Moisture spec is the key control point.

Malaysia

Class C predominant. Tanjung Bin and Manjung power stations are the largest sources. FOB Port Klang or Tanjung Pelepas. Vessel sizing Handysize to Supramax. Reliable supply chain. Most accessible quality control.

Kazakhstan

Class F predominant. Ekibastuz and Pavlodar coal complexes generate large fly ash volumes. Land transport via rail to Caspian ports (Aktau) or to Black Sea ports (via Russia, with sanction-related complications). For Gulf delivery, the routing is typically rail to Iranian transit ports — which complicates US-buyer documentation. Most Au Club Kazakh ash goes to Gulf and Mediterranean buyers who do not have US-nexus issues.

South Africa

Class F predominant. Eskom power stations (Lethabo, Matla, Kendal, Majuba) produce significant export volumes. FOB Richards Bay or Durban. Vessel sizing Supramax to Panamax. Established quality control. Au Club’s largest single-origin volume for Gulf delivery.

Logistics reality — what changes the price-per-MT delivered

Three practical issues that affect landed cost:

Moisture. Fly ash is hygroscopic. A 12% moisture cargo behaves and handles differently than an 8% moisture cargo. Cement producers specify maximum moisture (usually 8-10%). Above-spec moisture means rejection or steep penalties. Vessels carrying fly ash need closed cargo holds with adequate ventilation.

Vessel handling. Bulk fly ash is loaded by conveyor and discharged either by pneumatic suction or by grab. Pneumatic discharge is cleaner and faster but requires specific vessel and port equipment. Many Gulf cement plant discharge facilities prefer pneumatic. The wrong vessel adds discharge cost and time.

Port storage. Jebel Ali, Jeddah, and King Abdullah Port have bulk handling capacity but limited dedicated fly ash storage. Cement plants typically run silo-to-vessel chartering — meaning vessel scheduling matters more than spot inventory. A reliable supply partner manages the silo-fill cycle, not just the shipment.

How an Au Club fly ash contract is structured

Standard contract terms for a precast or RMC producer in the Gulf:

• Volume. Annual offtake commitment, with monthly schedule. Up to 1,000,000 MT/year supported across multiple origins.
• Specification. ASTM C618 Class C or F. Specific limits on LOI (≤6%), moisture (≤10% at loading, ≤8% on arrival if specified), residue on 45-micron sieve (≤34%).
• Inspection. SGS or Intertek at loading port and discharge port. Loading certificate includes COA, certificate of origin, moisture certificate.
• Price formula. Most contracts use a CFR Jebel Ali / CFR Jeddah base price, with freight component floating against Baltic Supramax or Handysize index. Some buyers prefer fixed CFR for budget certainty.
• Payment. LC at sight, or 30/60/90 day deferred LC. TT against pre-shipment documents for established buyers.
• Force majeure. Includes adverse weather at loading, port closure, and origin-country export licence issues.

Au Club’s read on 2025-2030 fly ash demand

Three working assumptions:

1. Saudi cement demand reaches 70-80 million MT annually by 2030. The trajectory is consistent across forecaster sources. Vision 2030 is not slowing.
2. SCM content in giga-project concrete specifications averages 25-35%. Higher in marine and high-strength applications. Lower in routine residential.
3. Class F fly ash is the binding supply constraint. South African and Kazakh origins will be sold forward through 2030 within the next 12-18 months.

For cement producers and ready-mix suppliers: lock 2026-2028 supply now. Spot pricing in 2027-2028 will reflect the demand surge. Multi-year contracts at today’s price levels are the strategic move.

FAQs

About Au Club

Au Club supplies bulk fly ash (Class C and Class F) up to 1,000,000 MT/year from Laos, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, and South Africa. FOB, CFR, and CIF terms. SGS or Intertek pre-shipment inspection. We supply ready-mix concrete suppliers, precast producers, and cement plants across the Gulf. Contact our trading desk to discuss your 2026-2030 requirement.

Sources & further reading

• Saudi General Authority for Statistics — Cement output
• Vision 2030 official portal
• ASTM C618 — Fly ash classification
• Global CCS Institute — Construction emissions